Latest US poll: 63% say gas prices are affecting their household budget a great deal or a moderate amount
See the pollData quality
Verified participants, structured recruitment and controlled fieldwork. We support survey research with consistent screening, active panel management and methods designed to deliver dependable, usable data.
Finished in under half the median time
The same answer on every row of the grid
Keyboard mashing in two open answers
Verified participants
Every PocketsFull member joined through our app or website, so we can tell you how they came to the panel and what they were promised. If a study needs more people than our own panel can supply, we tell you before fieldwork starts.
Members join PocketsFull on Android or on the PocketsFull website. We find them with our own app advertising.
Each member fills in a profile survey, which helps us match them to studies they can actually take.
The app asks a survey's qualifying questions first. If the answers do not fit, the survey does not open.
Members are paid for completes, not clicks. Quality fails earn nothing, and an hourly limit on survey starts slows down anyone who rushes.
Audience brief
Feasibility checked on the panel before we quote
Where the checks sit
Follow one respondent from the app to your file.
Before the survey · In the PocketsFull app
When a PocketsFull member taps a survey, the app first asks that survey's qualifying questions. If the answers do not fit, the survey does not open, so fewer people who cannot qualify reach your screener.
At the door · As each person opens the survey
Repeat entries from the same device or IP address, people outside the countries you allow and VPN or proxy traffic are stopped as they arrive. You choose per survey whether a failed check ends the survey for that person or only flags them.
While they record · Video and audio answers
A quick camera check confirms a live person is in front of the camera, in enough light. Each recording is then checked for length, words and topic. If it fails, the person sees why and records again.
After the answers · Against the whole sample
Once answers are in, each respondent is checked for rushing, the same answer down a whole grid, gibberish and off-topic answers. Every flag comes with its reason.
You decide · Before the data is delivered
The validation summary shows a pass or fail for each check, with the reason. Keep or remove people one at a time or in bulk, and download the summary as a CSV for your files.
Checks on every response
Layer 1 · At the door
FraudCheck runs as each person opens a CatalyseAI study, before they answer a single question. It stops repeat entries, people outside your country and traffic from VPNs or proxies, and you decide per survey whether a failed respondent is terminated or only flagged.
Layer 2 · In the answers
In a CatalyseAI study, every respondent is checked for rushing, straight-lining, gibberish and off-topic answers, and video answers are checked while they are recorded. Each flag comes with a reason, and you decide who stays in the data.
FraudCheck decides who gets in. Response quality checks look at how people answered.
Process standards
ISO 20252 is the international standard for market, opinion and social research, including insights and data analytics. It sets out shared terms and service requirements for running research projects, from planning and fieldwork to reporting.
What we report back
You see what was checked, what failed and why, not just a cleaned file.
One row per respondent, with a pass or fail for each check and the reason behind every flag.
Download the validation summary as a CSV, to send to a sample supplier or keep with the project files.
Accepted answers, re-recordings, average relevance and attention, and which checks sent attempts back.
Each start is recorded as a complete, a screen-out, an over quota, a security terminate or a drop-out, on both sides when your survey is hosted elsewhere.
On sampling projects we review the data for incomplete answers, failed trap questions, speeders, straight-liners and contradictions, and agree any removals with you before the final count.
Oat drink study · Q7 video answer
Why attempts were sent back
In the answer file
RespondentLengthRelevanceFollow-ups
FAQ
No. Answer checks flag people in the validation summary and you decide, one by one or with auto-reconcile. The exception is video: a recording that fails the camera or light check goes back to the person to record again. FraudCheck, which runs when people arrive, can terminate them on entry if you choose.
No. FraudCheck decides who gets in. Response quality checks look at how people answered, such as rushing, straight-lining, gibberish and off-topic answers.
Not on our PocketsFull panel. A security fail earns the member nothing for that survey.
Yes. Force a pass or a fail and add a reason. The change is logged, and undo restores the respondent's earlier status.
It is the international standard for market, opinion and social research, including insights and data analytics. It sets out shared terms and service requirements for running research projects, from planning and fieldwork to reporting.
We will walk you through the Validation tab, the reasons behind each flag and how the checks fit your study.
Offices: London (head office) · Orlando, FL · Gurgaon, Haryana