Naming, logo & slogan testing
Choose a name, logo or slogan with evidence
Put your shortlist in front of the people you want to reach before you commit to it. See which option they like, what it brings to mind, whether it fits the product, and which one they still remember a few minutes later.
- SparvelFits the product41%
- QuenchlyFits the product63%
- LumabrookFits the product55%
- FizzwickFits the product37%
First words for "Quenchly":thirst, refreshing, cold
Why test names
A shortlist picked in a meeting reflects the people in the meeting
Names, logos and lines are often chosen by a team that has lived with them for weeks. Buyers meet them cold. A test shows how each option lands with people who have never seen it, and catches problems early: a name that is hard to say, a logo that is hard to read, or a line that means something you did not intend.
What can go on the bench
First impressions
Watch a shortlist meet people cold
- 01The shortlist, shown fairly
- 02First words, in their own words
- 03Fit and first words build up
- 04What sticks
Step 1 / 4
The shortlist, shown fairly
Options appear in a random order, so position does not pick the winner.
Study set-up
Naming, logo & slogan testing
- StimulusFour candidate names for a lightly flavored sparkling water
- WhoUS adults who drink sparkling water
- FirstA short description of the product
- DesignThe four names in a random order
- LaterAfter a few other questions: which names do you remember?
Set up with our team, or yourself in CatalyseAI
Step 2 / 4
First words, in their own words
People rate how much they like each name and how well it fits, and type the first words it brings to mind.
Name 3 of 4
What is the first thing "Fizzwick" brings to mind?
How well does it fit a sparkling water?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Not at allVery well
"Quenchly sounds like it would actually quench your thirst."
"Lumabrook is pretty, but is it a water or a spa?"
"Sparvel? Like a sparrow. Not sure."
Step 3 / 4
Fit and first words build up
For every option: how much people like it, how well it fits, and the first words it brings to mind. An unwanted meaning shows up here.
Live tally, as answers arrive
Sparvel
- Fit41%
- Appeal46%
First words
- sparkle
- a sparrow?
- not sure
Quenchly
- Fit63%
- Appeal58%
First words
- thirst
- refreshing
- cold
Lumabrook
- Fit55%
- Appeal52%
First words
- light
- a stream
- a spa
Fizzwick
- Fit37%
- Appeal39%
First words
- fizzy
- a candle wick
- fun
An unwanted meaning, caught in the open answers. Shares are the top two boxes.
Step 4 / 4
What sticks
A few questions later, people say which names they remember. Unwanted meanings are listed.
Side by side
Six measures for every option
Each row is one measure, named the way the report names it.
Base: US adults who drink sparkling water; every name seen in a random order.
Top-two-box shares, except recall: the share who remembered the name later in the survey.
The pick
Example: naming a new sparkling water
A start-up has four candidate names for a lightly flavored sparkling water. US adults who drink sparkling water read a short product description, then see the four names in random order. They rate how much they like each name and how well it fits the product, and type the first words each name brings to mind. After a few unrelated questions, they are asked which names they remember. The report puts the four names side by side and lists any unwanted meanings that came up in the open answers.
Quenchly
Lead
Best on fit, ease and recall: people get it at once and remember it.
Run the trademark checks next.
Lumabrook
Runner-up
Stands apart the most, and fits well.
Some read it as a spa, not a drink.
Fizzwick
Drop
Easy to say, but one in five think of a candle wick.
An unwanted meaning, caught early.
Sparvel
Drop
Lowest on fit and recall.
People were unsure what it is.
Ask the studyAnswers from your own data
Did any name bring up something we did not intend?
Yes. Fizzwick reminded one in five people of a candle wick. Quenchly brought up thirst and refreshment, which fits the product.
It checks its numbers against your data and draws the chart.
Four steps
How the test works
From a shortlist to the name that sticks.
- 01
Send your shortlist
Names, logos or slogans, with a short description of the product or brand they are for.
- 02
Show the options fairly
Options appear in random order, so position does not pick the winner. Where each option needs to be judged on its own, each person sees just one.
- 03
Ask what matters
How much they like it, how well it fits the product, what it brings to mind in their own words, and how easy it is to say or read.
- 04
Check what sticks
A few questions later, people are asked which options they remember.
What you get
What you get
Output 01
Options side by side
Each option's scores next to the others, with significance markers on the gaps.
Output 02
First impressions in their words
Open answers for each option, grouped into themes and shown as a word cloud, including any meanings you did not intend.
Output 03
Click map for logos
A heatmap of the part of a logo or layout people notice first.
Output 04
Final choice
Which option people pick when they see them all together.
FAQ
Questions, answered
Does a name test replace a trademark check?
No. Research tells you how people react to a name. It does not tell you whether you can use or register it. Run legal checks before or alongside the test.
How many options should I test?
A shortlist is easier to read than a long list. If you have many candidates, rank them first with MaxDiff, then test the leaders in more depth.
Can I test logos as images?
Yes. Logos are shown as images, and a click question can show which part of the logo people notice first.
Related
Goes well with
Test your shortlist before you commit
Send us the options and a line about what they are for. We will suggest the audience and the questions.
Nearest office: Orlando, FL (corporate office)